Texts quoted by Fr Kees Braun in his Seminar of 14th February 2006

 

 

Jules Chevalier, Personal Notes, p 13

To the treatise on the Incarnation, our professor added a thesis on Devotion to the Sacred Heart; his development was both spiritual and learned and I wrote it down in every detail. My heart was touched and the more deeply I penetrated this doctrine, the more attractive it became. In addition, my confessor lent me the Life of the Blessed Margaret Mary by Bishop Languet. This work stirred up in me a keen desire to become the apostle of this devotion that Our Lord had himself given to the world as a powerful means of sanctification and which he wished to see spread everywhere. To answer his call, I conceived a plan to be realised as a priest – I would bring together some holy and zealous confreres and work to propagate Devotion to the Sacred Heart. I then singled out two of my companions as suitable members of such a group. Fearing the ridicule of others, however, I kept this fine dream to myself, and simply confided it to the Hearts of Jesus and Mary.

 

 

Jules Chevalier, Manuscript, 1855-1856

Ten years ago while still at the Major Seminary, I was reflecting on the disorders consuming society and I thought, or rather God inspired me with thought, of founding a community of missionary priests who would work to put them right. I spoke of this to my director but he dismissed it as a dream, a specious creation of my imagination. Embarrassed at his reaction, I determined to forget the matter, but in spite of my good intentions, the plan remained in my mind, becoming ever more absorbing as time went by.

A voice I could not ignore persisted within me: you will realise your dream; God wants this work.

With this in mind and with some apprehension I singled out as a likely companion in this undertaking – Abbé X…  I never spoke to him about it. But then where would we establish this new community? … Issoudun with its 14.000 inhabitants and its three priests was my spontaneous choice.

 

 

Jules Chevalier, 1862

The Heart of the divine Master is the centre

on which everything in the Old and New Testament converges,

the pivot around which everything in Catholicism turns,

the sun of the Church,

the soul of our souls,

the source of our mysteries,

the origin of our sacraments,

the pledge of our reconciliation,

the salvation of our world,

the remedy of all our ills.

That is how I understand devotion to the Sacred Heart:

it embraces everything,

it is the answer to everything.

 

 

Jules Chevalier, 1887

Devotion to the Sacred Heart

is the essence of Christianity

and contains all other devotions.

The Heart of Jesus

is the love of God,

God himself,

incarnate.

God is love.

 

 

Jules Chevalier, 1900

The Word,

coming from the Heart of his Father,

made the world emerge from nothing;

and from the Heart of the incarnate Word,

pierced on Calvary,

I see a new world merging,

the world of those he has chosen.

And this creation,

so fertile, full of grandeur

and inspired by love and mercy,

is the Church,

the mystical body of Christ,

which makes this new creation present on earth until

the end of time.

 

 

Perfectae Caritatis (Vatican II, 28.10.1965)

2. The up-to-date renewal of the religious life comprises both a constant return to the sources of the whole of Christian life and to the primitive inspiration of the institutes, and their adaptation to the changed conditions of our time. This renewal, under the impulse of the Holy Spirit and with the guidance of the Church, must be promoted in accordance with the following principles:

(a)               Since the final norm of the religious life is the following of Christ as it is put before us in the Gospel, this must be taken by all institutes as the supreme rule.

(b)               It is for the good of the Church that institutes have their own proper characters and functions. Therefore the spirit and aims of each founder should be faithfully accepted and retained, as indeed should each institute’s sound traditions, for all these constitute the patrimony of an institute.

(c)               All institutes should share in the life of the Church. They should make their own and should foster to the best of their ability, in a manner consonant with their own natures, its initiatives and undertakings in biblical, liturgical, dogmatic, pastoral, ecumenical, missionary and social matters.

(d)               Institutes should see to it that their members have a proper understanding of men, of the conditions of the times and of the needs of the Church, this to the end that, making wise judgments about the contemporary world in the light of faith, and burning with apostolic zeal, they be able to help men more effectively.

(e)               Before all else, religious life is ordered to the following of Christ by its members and to their becoming united with God by the profession of the evangelical counsels. For this reason, it must be seriously and carefully considered that even the best-contrived adaptations to the needs of our time will be of no avail unless they are animated by a spiritual renewal, which must always be assigned primary importance even in the active ministry.

 

 

Statement about the charism of the Founder

Without doubt Jules Chevalier received the charism of a Founder. The charism of a Founder is not a thing; it is not some thing. It is not a booklet nor a theory nor a doctrine. A charism is not worked calmly and coolly at a desk. It is a personal experience, an experience of the Spirit, a gift of the Holy Spirit.

 

In “Mutuae Relationes” (still an important Document of the Church about the relations between Bishops and Religious) we read the following important statement:

 

The very charism of the Founders (EN, 11) appears as “an experience of the Spirit,” transmitted to their disciples to be lived, safeguarded, deepened and constantly developed by them, in harmony with the Body of Christ continually in the process of growth. “It is for this reason that the distinctive character of various religious institutes is preserved and fostered by the Church” (LG, 44; cf. DC, 33; 35:1; 35:2; etc.). This distinctive character also involves a particular style of sanctification and of apostolate, which creates its particular tradition, with the result that one can readily perceive its objective elements.

 

In this hour of cultural evolution and ecclesial renewal, therefore, it is necessary to preserve the identity of ach institute so securely, that the danger of an ill-defined situation be avoided, lest religious, failing to give due consideration to the particular mode of action proper ‘to their character’, become part of the life of the Church in a vague and ambiguous way.